108 Questions to Sankara Mutt

108 Questions
To
Sankara Mutt

All human bodies after death are either buried or burned, and there is no difference in their perishable state. Do you deny this fact?
Can you deny the fact that a person would be lacking in understanding, if he attempts to judge another person as superior or inferior by birth based on the perishable body rather than taking into consideration the quality of the mind?
Can you deny the fact that the man who thinks about the common good of the world society is superior, and the one who is interested in only his personal welfare like animals, without any regard and respect for the common good of others, is inferior?
Is it not an animal nature that works only for the welfare of the self? Would you not consider one as selfish and satanic if he destroys the common good of the world society for the sake of his selfish aims? Do you deny this fact?
Is it not a divine nature to sacrifice one's own welfare for the sake of the world community? Do you disagree with the fact that such people who sacrifice their own well-being for the sake of the welfare of the world, are truly spiritual leaders?
Do you not put on the spiritual garb to make the world believe that you offer yourself for the welfare of the world community? Did not your predecessors follow the same tradition? If that is so, can you attest to the fact that the Sankara Mutt has overcome all inclination to strive for selfish motives and exists only for the welfare of the human society all over the world, in keeping with your spiritual appearance? Can you afford to state that you cherish a policy of self sacrifice with a view to promote the general welfare of the people of the world without partiality, that is practised by you in your day to day life and that your spiritual garb and behavior are in accordance with the above policy?
Can you deny the fact that, you and your Mutt are always thinking of the welfare of the Aryan Purohits who call themselves Brahmins instead of striving for the spiritual welfare of the world at large?
Is it not true that you are giving importance to one particular caste (by birth) rather than people with a noble mind when you think only about the welfare of the Brahmins, which is contrary to your spiritual garb? Does it not mean that you are concerned only about the perishable body which is either buried or consumed by fire? Don't you think that giving importance to the body instead of discerning the nobility of the mind is rather belittlement of human thinking?
Can you deny the fact that living only for the prosperity of the Brahmins, of your caste by birth, is not a spiritual life? You say that he who has realized the Brahmam is a Brahmin. Can you point out any instance, from history, of a non-Brahmin who had attained Brahmam by realization? The answer is 'No'. Is it not so? As such, is not your statement, 'He who has realized the Brahmam is a Brahmin', a false and deceitful concept? Can you deny this?
Do you have any instance from the history of your Mutt, that a non-Aryan Purohit, who has realized the Brahmam has been appointed, as the head of the mutt in any one of the five Sankara Mutts. If your answer is 'No', then your explanation for the word 'Brahmin' would be only to deceive the people of the world? Can you deny this?
Can any spiritual leader recognize an organization, which was established for and strives for the welfare of only a particular caste by birth, with disregard for the welfare of the world society as admirable?
Can you deny the fact that just like other caste organizations, the 'Brahmin Associations' exist only for the welfare of the Brahmins, who are Aryan-Purohits by birth? Any noble minded person who dislikes caste organizations which only promote the welfare of their own caste, would dislike these 'Brahmin Associations' also. Can you refute this statement?
Since the Aryan Purohits have organized the Brahmin Association on the model of any other Association functioning for the welfare of a particular caste alone, the Brahmin Association also receives the 'caste' stamp, and is degraded as a caste organization by spiritual leaders. To avoid a caste stamp and degradation, the Sankara mutts have put on a spiritual garb while operating as a caste organization. Can you refute this statement?
Since the Sankara Mutts strive more for the welfare of the Brahmins than the Brahmin Associations, how can you deny the fact that the spiritual garb worn by the Mutts has no other aim than to detract and deceive the people of 'other castes'? Can you deny this fact?
Just like the deception of your spiritual garb, is not Advaita a deceptive concept devised by your ancestor? Does Advaita give glory to the body, or to the spirit (life), or to the soul? Is it not a fact that you do not have an answer for this? Can you refute this?
Advaita is not a concept about God, in fact it is a concept that is against God, an Anti-theistic philosophy.

Atheistic religions	Jainism and Buddhism
Theistic religions	The Six-fold religions Saivism, Vaishnavism, Judaism, Christianity and Islam etc.
Theistic philosophies	Visishtadvaita, Dvaita and Saiva Sittanta
Anti-theistic Philosophy	Advaita (Aham Brahmasmi) (I am God) (Any thing that opposes God is Devil)

Theistic religions condemn anti-theism as demonic or satanic. Can you deny the fact that this satanic doctrine which opposes God, makes men say 'I am God' and renders evil to the common good of the world society, and is making the people to believe that Brahmins alone are equal to God and has made them to think that all the other castes are inferior to Brahmins, and thus has insulted, degraded and enslaved them through the ages?
Can you deny the following fact? "You are the descendants of the Aryan Purohit Brahmins who came to India in search of a livelihood. Then the Dravidian king Brhathratha not only welcomed you, but also gave you a livelihood and a main role in his government. In 185 B.C., by treachery and deception, Pushyamitra, an Aryan, had killed him in a coup and assumed the governance of his kingdom. As the descendent of that impostor, you continue to cherish and maintain the same deception and fraud initiated by him, and the Advaita concept, Sankara Mutt and the Sankaracharyas are the culmination of the deception".
You are accused of perverting history by interpolating it with false statements, such as Brahmins existed even during the time of Buddha, and the Varnashrama Dharma which fortifies the existence of high and low castes was practised then. Can you disprove this charge?
Can you deny the fact that there was no trace of casteism or Varnashrama Dharma before the period of Pushyamitra which is 185 B.C. Could you also deny the fact that the divisions which were mentioned earlier to this period were the divisions of labour and groups (race, language, etc.) but not the division of casteism?
In the Indigo written by Megasthenes there is no reference for the practice of casteism in India. Can you deny the truth that there was no casteism in India in 4th C. B.C.?
Though your ancestors have cunningly overthrown the Mauryan rule, in order to portray yourselves as morally good, you have purposely created a fable that Chanakya, the Aryan Purohit was the helper in establishing the Mauryan dynasty. Can you refute this historical fact? Could you afford to deny that, you who had cunningly overthrown the Mauryan dynasty, created the Chanakya drama, a false fable, in order to camouflage your plot?
Will it be possible for you to refute that your caste, the Aryan Purohits are evil minded by nature of heredity and Pushyamitra, an ancestor of your caste, is an example of this?
Can you refute the historical fact that you, and the Aryan Purohits, are the descendants of the Sungas established by Pushyamitra and the Kanvas who ruled India after the Sunga dynasty?
Could you deny the historical fact that you and your community are the descendants of the Sungas and Kanvas, the impostors who came to India from outside in search of a livelihood and occupied this land treacherously? The Sungas and the Kanvas plotted against the kings who showed them kindness, and killed those who trusted them and had given them high posts in their government.
Is it not appropriate to call of you Kshatriyas, since you are the descendants of the Sungas and Kanvas, the impostors who ruled Dravidian India for 157 years from 185 B.C. to 28 B.C.? However, you have named yourselves as Purohits and Brahmins instead of Kshatriyas. This is a historical deception, can you refute this?
Your ancestors who captured the political power by deception, ruled for 157 years. After loosing political power to new foreign invaders who came into India and captured the political power, your predecessors made a treacherous covenant with the new foreigners against the Indians. Thus your ancestors indulged in treacherous activities against the Indians and became advisors to the new foreign invaders in establishing their foreign rule in India. Can you refute this?
Amongst the white people who came to India from outside, you who came without any religion and captured the political power of India by treachery and ruled for 157 years, in order to continue to enslave the Indians, you have given the name 'Kshatriyas' to the white people who had came without religion from outside with a military force and captured political power, and you have given the name 'Vaishyas' to the white people who had came from outside to India without religion for trade purposes. Thus you have classified them and associated with them in the treachery. Can you deny this? (Worship is different from religion which requires religious law, philosophy, literature etc., whereas worship is universal in occurrence.)
You, the white people, who came to India from outside without any religion, have plundered the religious, political and economical power from the Indians and have distributed these among yourselves, the white foreigners, under the leadership of your ancestors. Thus the covenant of sharing was carried out under your leadership, and that is why even though you have ruled for 157 years you do not call yourselves Kshatriyas. Can you refute this?
The term 'Aryans' was coined to denote the group of people who came to India from outside without any religion in various periods. Since their colour was different from the colour of the Indian people, their commonalty is based on their white complexion. Can you refute that the laws have been devised on the basis of colour during your ancestors' rule and this is known as Varnashrama Dharma, and the term 'Aryan race' was coined on the basis of the complexion?
Before the arrival of the Aryans, the people who lived all over India were denoted as Dravidians and their culture is very ancient, and they are the root cause for the development of religions all over the world. Could you afford to deny this?
The term 'Dravidar' is the mutilated form of the term 'Tamilar' (Tamilar - Thramilar - Dravidar - Draavidar). The foreigners mutilated the term Tamilar as Dravidar. So, in the Sanskrit Dictionary (A Sanskrit-English Dictionary -Sir Monier Monier-Williams - Motilal Banarsidass-1988) the term 'Dravidar' can be seen and not the term `Tamilar'. Can you refute this?
Could you afford to refute that the term 'Dravida' in terms such as Dravida Basha, Dravida Sangam, Dravida Vetham, Dravida Upanishad, Dravida Mapadiam, Dravida Sisu etc., refers to 'Tamil'.
The terms 'Dravidian race' and 'Aryan race' refer to two different races. The non-Dravidians who speak the Dravidian language and dwell in the Dravidian region are also denoted as Dravidians. Could you refute this historical fact?
Those who are not able to differentiate the Dravidians by race, the Dravidians by place and the Dravidians by language, confuse the Dravidians by race with the other two. Can this truth be refuted by you?
Those who are not able to know the differences historically, confused themselves and confuse others by saying that there is no Dravidian race or Aryan race. Can you refute this?
While you, the white Aryan race were ruling, you have given the title 'Sudras' to the Dravidians who did not oppose your domination but accepted your treacherous control and led a life of slavery without considering the concept "whether Rama rules or Ravana rules what is going to happen?- nothing". And you have given the title 'Panchamas' to those Dravidians who opposed your treachery. Thus you have split Dravidian Indians into two groups. Can you refute this?
While your white Aryan race was ruling, you associated the Dravidians who were enslaved by you as 'Sudras' with the three groups of your Aryan race. With the help of the rulers who were your supporters, you devised the law that these four groups (Chathurvarna) alone could have the citizenship. However, you have degraded and tyrannised the Dravidian spiritual leaders, warriors, rulers, scholars, etc., who opposed your domination as untouchables and unseeables. Could you deny this historical fact?
The concept of caste discrimination devised by you, is against the four Vedas starting with the Rig Veda, which are claimed to be yours and against the Six-fold religions based on the family relationship of Siva. This is the satanic doctrine devised by you, the Aryan Purohit Brahmins. When the Six-fold religions came into the fold of this satanic doctrine, the Six-fold religions were also coated with this satanic doctrine. In the later period the same coating was given to the Prajapathi which is in the Rig Veda. Can you refute this?
Could you deny the fact, that your ancestors have blighted the Buddhists and Buddhism by using various plots after the period of Pushyamitra.
Just as the predecessors of your Aryan Purohit caste had destroyed Buddhism, your ancestors have disguised themselves as Saivite and Vaishnavite religious leaders and enslaved these religions when there was a revival in them. Can you refute this?
Your, the Aryan Purohit caste have twisted the meaning of the term 'Brahmins' to denote the Aryan Purohit caste. Actually the terms Saivites, Vaishnavites and Brahmins denote the followers of Siva, Vishnu and Brahma of trinity concept and they have nothing to do with your worship and community. Can you refute this historical fact?
You who came from outside without any religion, brought the Indian Dravidian religions under your control and domination, and by utilizing the Indian religious beliefs you have been annihilating, enslaving, degrading and plundering the Indian people. You used the Sudras who were enslaved by you, against the Panchamas who opposed your domination, for your purposes. Could you deny this historical fact?
To enslave the Indian Dravidians through the ages on the basis of their religious beliefs and to maintain your supremacy, the deceptive and satanic doctrine was devised by your ancestors, the Aryan Purohits, and this doctrine is known under various names, Varnashrama Dharma, Manu Dharma, Sanadhana Dharma, Advaita concept, or Hindu Dharma. Can you deny this?
This satanic doctrine mentioned above which was devised by your white Aryan Purohit caste, has no connection or relationship with the basic concepts of the Dravidian Indian religions, such as 'One God one race', 'Every country is my country and all are my relatives', etc. Can you deny this?
Since the satanic doctrine of your Aryan Purohit caste mentioned above in it's various names has nothing to do with the basic concepts of the Indian religions, the Supreme Court of India has firmly decreed that Hinduism is not a religion but a way of life, and by saying this, it has been proved that you have been deceiving and plundering the Indian people through the ages. Can you deny this?
Can't we expect that you should have known completely the full history of Siva worship since you claim that you are the leaders of Hinduism and smear on your forehead, the 'holy ash', which is a symbol of Saivism?
Should not the development of Siva worship be authenticated with substantial historical evidences transcending the stories, Puranas and Ithihasas, so as to be accepted by the research scholars? Sivalinga which is established as the Dravidian worship on the basis of historical evidences, is found in the Indus Valley excavations. This could be treated as the first stage of Siva worship.
We witness the emergence of the 'Six-fold religions', a long interval after the Indus Valley civilization. These Six-fold religions based on Siva worship are linked through the names of the family relationship of Siva. Siva has two sons through Sakthi and two sons through Vishnu and totally seven members are mentioned in the family of Siva. They are Siva, Sakthi, Kumarakkadavul, Pillaiyar, Vishnu, Brahma and Aiyappa. Amongst the seven, Brahma was cast away as a cheat and a liar, and you must be aware that hence according to tradition there should not be any temple or worship or religion in the name of Brahma, the one who is spoken highly of by you the Brahmins. Discarding Brahma, there are six religions in the names of the rest. As you are aware of the fact that it was Adi Sankara, the First head of your Mutt, who in the 8th C.A.D, amalgamated the Six-fold religions, Saivism, Vaishnavism, Saktham, Gaumaram, Ganapathyam and Sauram which are the offshoots of Siva worship, with the motive of paving the way for the supremacy of the Aryan Purohits.
The Six-fold religions to this day are in the control of the Aryan Purohit Brahmins who came in from the outside into India without any religion.
The historical growth of Siva worship that took place during the period between Siva worship of the Indus Valley civilization and the rise of the Six-fold religions of the family of Siva in India may be termed as the second stage.
The period starting from the origin of the above mentioned Six-fold religions to the present day may be termed as the third stage.
For the first stage of development we have the Indus valley civilization, and for the third stage of development we have Six-fold religions of the family of Siva as evidences. However, the four Vedas, Rig, Yajur, Sama and Atharva are said to be the basis for the development of the second stage of Siva worship which falls between the first stage, Indus Valley Siva worship and the third stage, Six-fold religions which form the relationship of Siva family. Do you accept this? Do the four Vedas say anything about the development of the Sivalinga worship which falls in between the period of the Indus Valley civilization and the period in which the Six-fold religions based on the family relationship of Siva were developed?
Do you find any reference concerning the family relationship of Siva in the four Vedas starting with Rig? Could you refute that there is no reference to show the family relationship of Siva in the four Vedas?
Do you find the Sivalinga, the Sacrificial Altar and the Bull, which together form the basis of Siva family's Six-fold religions, in the four Vedas? Can you refute it if we say 'no'?
In addition to the Sivalinga, the Sacrificial Altar and the Bull which are the developmental aspects of Indus Valley Sivalinga worship, God has given His son to be born into this world and the birth of Kumarakkadavul (Son of God) has given rise to the concept of Siva family, which in turn has given rise to the Six-fold religions. Do the four Vedas, which you hold in high esteem, speak about the above concepts? These concepts do not find a place there and the Vedas have no relationship with these concepts. Can you refute this?
When you claim that the four Vedas belong to you, why then you smear the sacred ash, a sacred symbol of Siva on your forehead and follow the worship which is very much associated with the Sivalinga, the Sacrificial Altar and the Bull which are not found in the Vedas? Can you explain this historically?
Though you claim that Vedas are yours, you do not eat the meat offered in the Yajna fire and do not drink the Soma drink and the Sura drink. Can you give reasons as to why you are leading a life quite contrary to the Vedic principles?
From which period did your ancestors, the Aryan Purohits, start living a life which is totally contrary to your Vedic principles? Can you explain historically?
In the temples of the Siva family, which are under your treacherous control, there are sacrificial altars, but there is no offer of sacrifice. Do you know why sacrifice is not offered on the altars, and when were they stopped and the reasons behind this? Can you explain the reason by substantiating it with historical evidences?
Do you know that Siva worship belongs to Dravidians and it is as essential as their life and do you know that the Dravidians carried this worship in the world along with them wherever they went?
Do you know that there is a Veda which tells us the history of the worship of the Sivalinga, the Sacrificial Altar and the Bull incorporated together, and sacrifices offered on the altar in worshipping the Supreme God Siva?
Do you know that there is a Veda which explains historically that the supreme God Siva, the basis for the development of the Six-fold religions and the beginning of the Siva family, has made his Son to be born into this world?
The Veda with the Sivalinga, the Sacrificial Altar and the Bull, and also with sacrifices being offered on the Altar, had the written form and the name 'Veda' long before the period of Christ. The Veda claimed as your belongings, compiled by a Dravidian Veda Vyasa, doesn't have the Sivalinga, the Sacrificial Altar and the Bull. But it had the written form and the name 'Veda' only after the 1st C. A.D., and before that there was no Veda which could be claimed as your belongings. Could you deny this?
The Vedanta talks about the worship of the Son of Siva which is developed from the worship of the Sivalinga, the Sacrificial Altar and the Bull, and it has the doctrine of fulfillment of sacrifice which is developed from the doctrine of sacrifice. The Six-fold religions of the Siva family, such as the Saivism and others are the Vedantic religions have the doctrine of fulfillment of sacrifice. Can you deny these?
The Vedas, claimed as your belongings, have the doctrine of sacrifice. The Jainism and the Buddhism deny the doctrine of sacrifice. Vedanta has the doctrine of fulfillment of sacrifice. Can you explain the historical reasons for the development of these three different doctrines?
In the Vedas, which you claim as yours, can you refute the fact that there is no temple worship?
Could you refute the fact that the temple worship belongs to the Vedanta, which is the development of Dravidian worship?
Could you deny the fact that the Dravidian Veda Vyasa compiled the nomadic songs of worship and classified them as the Vedas in order to explain the Vedantic concept, which has the temple worship and the doctrine of fulfillment of sacrifice.
Could you refute this statement that the Dravidian Veda Vyasa compiled the four Vedas starting with the Rig, and the Upanishads, and wrote the Puranas, which have the trinity concept, which is not seen in the four Vedas starting with the Rig, in order to spread the Vedantic concept, which is totally contrary to the four Vedas.
Is it possible for you to deny that the Dravidian Vedantic concept has nothing to do with the Aryan worship? Also, Adi Sankara wrote distorted commentaries for the Brahma Sutra, the Upanishads and the Bhagavad-Gita, which are the Dravidian Vedantic literature, in order to corrupt the Dravidian Vedantic concept and elevate the Vedas.
Can you deny the fact that Adi Sankara has written distorted interpretations with a deceptive motive, so that the Aryan Purohits can deceive and plunder the Dravidians? Can you refute that the Advaita concept was devised with a wrong intention to elevate the Aryan Purohits, and though the Visishtadvaita, the Dvaita and the Saiva Sittanta established that the Advaita concept was wrong, the Aryan Purohits still have the objective to plunder the Dravidians without any regard for the truth, and they exalt Adi Sankara and the Advaita concept?
There are ample historical evidences to prove that the Aryan Purohits are the experts in conspiracy and deceit. The books written and the philosophies developed by Dravidians are for the welfare of the whole world. Similarly, can you point out any book written or philosophy developed by any Aryan Purohit for the welfare of the whole world? You cannot show any book or philosophy. Can you deny this?
Your Aryan Purohit caste have written distorted interpretation to the Vedas compiled by Veda Vyasa, and to the other literature either compiled or written by Veda Vyasa. In order to hide the truth, you have passed a mandate through the rulers who were under your influence, that the Dravidians should not read, listen or see these literature. Could you deny this historical fact?
You have separated Brahma, the son of Siva from the Trinity Siva, Vishnu, Brahma, and twisted it into a satanic doctrine which is against Siva, by stating that 'I am God'. Thus the Brahman concept was perverted into a satanic doctrine, which is against God. Can you refute this?
So, a legend was created that the son of Siva, Kumarakkadavul (Murugan), imprisoned Brahman, who was diverted as the rival God. Can you deny this?
Can you deny this fact that another legend was created that Siva cut off the head of Brahman, and became 'Kapaleeswarar' since Brahman had pride against Siva.
So, the Brahmins who have 'Brahman' in their hearts, are against the Supreme God Siva and have brought themselves to the level of degrading Siva as the 'God of Sudras'. Can you deny this?
Hence a stage developed that there should be no temple or worship or religion for Brahman. This shows that there is no separate religion or worship for the Brahmins who say that 'I am God'. Can you deny this historical fact?
Could you deny the fact that your worship neither corresponds to your Vedas nor to the Dravidian Vedantic system? Also, are not lying and deceiving alone your religion and the way of life?
Since you have no separate worship or religion, you have taken captive the temples of the Six-fold religions with the help of the rulers who were deceived by you, and you have given a full form to the Varnashrama Dharma, the caste system based on birth, and coated the religions of the family of Siva (that is the Six-fold religions) with the Varnashrama Dharma concept like unwanted creepers on a tree. Could you deny this?
Hence, the Supreme court of India passed a judgement that the Hinduism, which developed on the basis of Six-fold religions, is not a religion but a way of life. Thus it separated the unwanted creepers (Varnashrama Dharma) from the tree (the Six-fold religions). Can you deny this?
You have separated Brahman, the son of Siva, from the Trinity of Siva, Vishnu and Brahma, and aryanized it, and then started portraying him against the Supreme God Siva, and began degrading Siva as the God of the Sudras. So, Murugan, Pillaiyar and Aiyappan, the Dravidian Vedantic son of Siva worship that developed in the different stages, had to oppose the Aryan Brahman. Can you deny this?
The Brahman concept which was devised by your ancestors against Siva, was defeated by the Visishtadvaita, the Dvaita and the Saiva Sittanta. Though you are aware of this fact, you continue to acclaim and propagate the defeated satanic Advaita doctrine, as per your usual treachery and political influence. Could you refute this?
Though the Saiva Sittanta, the Dvaita and the Visishtadvaita have totally defeated the Advaita, since these philosophies are under the fold of the Varnashrama Dharma, they are purposely oppressed and concealed by your political influence. Can you deny this?
Brahma who is in the Trinity concept, is the Kumarakkadavul (Son of God), the son of Siva, and in the concept of Kumarakkadavul the son of Siva, there is scope for soul and God explicitly. But Brahma, the son of Siva has been wrongly interpreted and twisted in order to make Brahman concept with no scope for the Soul and God, but only about spirit (life), and through this satanic Advaita doctrine which is against God and focused on spirit (life) only, it was treacherously devised to plunder others and enable the Brahmins to lead a worldly flourishing life. Could you deny this?
Sitting in God's temple and acting as God, and saying that 'I am God', is the 'Brahman concept' which opposes Kumarakkadavul (Son of God) and this satanic doctrine is totally against the Kumarakkadavul concept (anti Son of God), and those who follow the 'Brahman concept (Aham Brahmasmi)' are Brahmins, and the practice of this satanic nature is called Brahminism. It is Adi Sankara who gave full form to Brahminism. Can you refute this?
The Advaita philosophy devised by Adi Sankara does not contain any knowledge of the soul and God, but deals with spirit (life) alone. Hence it degrades from the level of human beings who have soul, to the highest one amongst the living beings, the level of animals which do not have soul but spirit (life) alone, and thus it is suitable to the animal way of life. Can you deny this? The Advaita philosophy is only suitable to a demonic state which opposes God, and to the state of animals amongst living beings. Can you refute this?
Can you refute the fact that those who have this doctrine which is suitable to a demonic state which opposes God, and to the state of animals, would oppose the Supreme God and lead an animal way of life?
Can you refute the statement that you are rendering a obscure explanation to the Sivalinga and degrading the holy Dravidian Saivite symbol, since you could not experience the Supreme God and understand the holiness of the Sivalinga, which is a symbolic representation to denote God and venerated by the Dravidian seers?
Since you are ignorant of the Supreme God, can you refute the fact that in spite of smearing the holy ash, a symbol of Saivism, you are indulging in an act of ignominy by pronouncing Lord Siva as a God of Sudras?
Will it be possible for you to refute the fact that thus by giving a disgraceful interpretation to the Sivalinga and you who degrade the Supreme God Siva as the 'God of Sudras', have enslaved the Six-fold religions based on the family of Siva and their temples, and through this you are not only enslaving but humiliating the Dravidians who are the followers of the above religions, and, when you smear the holy ash on your forehead, it reveals that you are acting to deceive and ultimately you are striving for the welfare of the Aryan Brahmins alone?
Can you refute the fact that since you and your followers could not know about God and the soul, you are worshipping the elements you know, the sun and fire, as god?
Can you refute this fact? "Since you do not have the knowledge of the Supreme God, you are deceiving us, the Dravidian people, by saying that the God in the temples of our Six-fold religions are void of having any power. And you lie and deceive the people by performing Yajna so as to transfer power to our God from you, a mere man?"
As one with the satanic doctrine which opposes God, can you also refute this fact that since the Dravidians permit you to enter into their temples they have forsaken their higher status and are living a life of slavery under you, and, consequently they are undergoing immense sufferings?
Can you refute this also? "It is the birth right of the Dravidians who happen to be the seers endued with bakthi and self-respect, to prohibit you from entering into their temple since you are the enemies of God, and in case you try to gain entry into their temple they should take appropriate steps to apprehend you?"
Could you refute that Adi Sankara while pretending to write an interpretation to the Bhagavad-Gita which has the doctrine of trinity, gave a full form to the Brahma concept in the Advaita philosophy? Thus, you are saying that Brahma concept is totally different from the trinity concept, and you degrade Siva as the God of Sudras and give a corrupt and immoral interpretation to the Sivalinga, and have enslaved the Six-fold religions of the family of Siva by amalgamating the Six-fold religions under the fold of the Brahman concept of Advaita, in order to plunder the Indian Dravidians through the ages. This is the combined satanic conspiracy devised by your Aryan Purohit caste. Can you refute this?
Because of this combined conspiracy, your Aryan Purohit caste have been plundering, insulting and degrading the Dravidian Indians, and through the ages you are enjoying all the benefits. Because of this, those who have had political and economical power in India through the assistance of this satanic doctrine are coming to your chief places, a nest of plunderers, and prostrating before you because of your position in maintaining this satanic doctrine without any consideration for your personal behavior in order to show their gratitude. Can you deny this?
You have been plotting against the three groups of Dravidian communities such as Backward class people who have been enslaved as Sudras, the Scheduled class who have been kept as untouchables or the Panchamas, and the religious minorities who were converted because of your oppression and making them to fight against each other, and through associate organisations like the R.S.S. and Brahmin Samaj you have been plotting through so many strategies to trouble, destroy and plunder the Dravidians in liberated India. This is confirmed by the secret circulars of these organisations which are found in the appendix. Can you refute this? (The link between you and these circulars had been explained in the book 'Why a Confrontation with the Sankara Mutt?', and it was sent to you on 27.3.1996 asking for your opinion. It is to be remembered that since you are not able to deny this fact you have been kept quiet.)
Can you refute that since the Kanchi Sankara Mutt is one of the plot hatcheries which has the bounded duty to conspire against the freedom struggles of the Dravidians, and through concealing, twisting, lying and plotting you have commanded the Chief Minister through the magazine 'Junior Vikatan' (23.6.1996) that the Dravida Samaya Marumalarchi Iyakkam (The Revival Movement of the Dravidian Religion) which is fighting for the freedom of Dravidians should be nipped in the bud? We have sent copies of the letter, written to you on 6.7.1996 explaining and exposing your plot and asking whether it can be refuted by you, to 'Junior Vikatan', and to the Chief Minister of Tamilnadu. Can you refute that the 'Junior Vikatan' has published this matter by correcting it's fault and you have kept quiet accepting your deceit without refuting it? (The letter dated 6.7.1996 is appended herewith).
When the Dravida Samaya Marumalarchi Iyakkam arranged for a prayer to God for the sake of the repentance of the Brahmins, instead of utilising the Brahmin Association you made use of Hindu Munnani Dravidians to oppose a Dravidian movement which is agitating for the liberation of the Dravidians. Since you could not oppose a racial struggle, you distorted the racial struggle and gave it the colour of a religious struggle between Christianity and Hinduism through a circular issued by the Hindu Munnani. Do these not amount to establish the fact that Sankara Mutt is a plot-hatchery? Can you refute that you have lost the right to enter into our temple since you were not able to answer the 23 questions sent to you in the letter dated 30.07.1996 with the caption 'Can we allow you to enter into our temple' and explaining that the Sankara Mutt is a plot-hatchery?
Can you refute that it is the rightful duty of each and every citizen of India who has self-respect and rational thought, to stop your treacherous activities since your place is acting as a plot-hatchery against the Dravidians in a free India? Can you accept that when every true Indian realises his duty, you cannot prolong your treachery anymore against all Indians? If you accept this, can you refute that it would be beneficial for you and for the Aryan Purohits i.e., the Brahmins, only when you give heed to our demand to appoint about a five year old boy from the lowest caste as branded by you, a Bala Sankaracharya in the existing vacancy to bring about a change in Sankara Mutt?
If you are not willing to accept our demands, the State Government, Central Government and the United Nations Organisation have to take action against you and your Mutt and provide justice since you are indulged in antisocial activities against the welfare of the world community. Can you deny this?
Can you deny this fact that it is the duty of all mankind who desire humanism, to emphasize that the three types of Governments mentioned above should take action against you, since you are acting as an antisocial element.
When light comes darkness will vanish, when knowledge comes ignorance will be overcome, and when the Grace of God comes the Satanic stronghold will be vanquished. Can you deny this?
Amongst the Brahmin caste there are righteous people who think fairly and strive for justice (amongst them are the Smartha Brahmins of Vivekananda College in Chennai, Prof. Venkataramanan and Prof. Venkataraman, who have proposed and seconded our demands which are mentioned above), they are to be greatly appreciated. Everyday such people are increasing and a great change would take place in the Sankara Mutt and our demands would be accepted and a stage would come when we all would live as the children of one mother, loving brothers and sisters, and as the loving children of God. Can you refute this?
Back to home

108 Questions to Sankara Mutt

Back to home